Skip to content

2024 – 2029 Permit Implementation Tool

Summary: Marysville Phase II permit compliance tool, Lake stevens Phase II permit compliance tool, Permit tracking by quarter, color coded compliance deadline tracker Phase II

Summary:
Marysville Phase II permit compliance tool, Lake stevens Phase II permit compliance tool, Permit tracking by quarter, color coded compliance deadline tracker Phase II

2024 – 2029 NPDES MS4 Permit Implementation Tracking Tool

Summary: Permit Implementation Tracking tool, Thurston County template, compliance tool Phase II, compliance by due date,

Summary:
Permit Implementation Tracking tool, Thurston County template, compliance tool Phase II, compliance by due date,

Stormwater Pollution Prevention for Presure Washing Brochure

Stormwater Pollution Prevention for PRESSURE WASHING Keep our communities, creeks, lakes, and Puget Sound healthy. Special Considerations for Buildings: PCBs • Buildings built or renovated from about 1950 to 1979 had widespread use of PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls). • PCBs may be present in caulking, grout, joint materials, paints, sealants, lubricants, roofing, metal coatings, and light ballasts. • PCBs are toxic and cancercausing chemicals. Wash Water Disposal • Wash water that contains solid waste and petroleum products must be filtered prior to disposal. LOCAL CONTACT INFORMATION AND LOGO HERE Hazardous Waste Disposal • Pressure washing can create hazardous waste that needs special disposal, including: » Dirty absorbent materials that may contain PCBs. » Rags or absorbent pads with gasoline, oils, grease, thinner, solvent, or organic chemicals. • Dispose of hazardous waste properly. » Option 1: Use a licensed waste hauler. » Option 2: Bring small quantities of accepted waste to a hazardous waste drop-off location. • Keep records of your hazardous waste disposal: who hauled it, how much was hauled, and when it was hauled. To request an ADA accommodation, contact Ecology by phone at 360-407-6600 or email at [email protected], or visit ecology. wa.gov/accessibility. For Relay Service or TTY call 711 or 877-833-6341. Type of Wash Water Dispose to Sanitary Sewer Dispose to Ground Dispose to Storm Sewer or Natural Water Body Plain water + filtered Soapy water + filtered Dirty/turbid water Oily water + oil-absorbing filter Dirty or soapy water with no filtration PCBs In Buildings tinyurl.com/tmbth5wn * * * *check with your local jurisdiction Prepared by Aspect Consulting Find a Hazardous Waste Service Provider Find a Hazardous Waste Disposal Site tinyurl.com/y64pt48r tinyurl.com/46nczhbk Setup • Identify where wash water will flow and temporarily cover storm drains. • Use a containment system to capture wash water. » For ground surfaces, use a pressure washer with a built-in water reclaimation system. » For equipment and vehicles, line the area with a ground tarp and surround it with a temporary berm. • Equipment needed for portable wash water containment system: Pressure Washing Best Practices for Pollution Prevention Capture the Wash Water • While washing, move or adjust the containment system to capture and contain the wash water. Treat the Wastewater • Use filter fabric to filter the water. • Solid pieces of waste go into the garbage. BMPs for Washing to Best Management Practices (BMPs) • Sweep work areas to cleanup. • Cover or block nearby storm drains. • Do NOT direct or pour wash water into a storm drain. • DO manage wash water by one of these options: 1. Direct into a landscaped area to soak into the ground. 2. Discharge to the sanitary sewer (toilet or indoor sink) is okay if the water has only small amounts of grit or oil. The Problem • Wastewater from washing practices can contain toxic pollutants. • Pressure washing can release pollutants from surfaces due to the force of the water. • When not cleaned up properly, waste from washing can pollute stormwater runoff. • Storm drains flow to the nearest creek, lake, wetland, or Puget Sound. Only Rain Down the Drain • Regulations and laws about pressure washing can vary by location, and some jurisdictions strictly regulate pressure washing. • But they all have one thing in common: ONLY RAIN DOWN THE DRAIN. • Do NOT use soap or chemicals. • Wash water that contains soap (including biodegradable), chemicals, soil, or is untreated should NOT be dumped – these are pollutants and can kill fish. Sweep and use dry cleanup methods. Do NOT hose off the ground. » Storm drain grate covers » Ground cover tarps » Portable pump and hoses » Portable ground berm » Sand bags » Absorbent pads and socks/boom Stormwater Pollution Education Guide https://apps.ecology. wa.gov/publications/ documents/0710058.pdf DIY Wash Water Reclaim System youtube.com/watch ?v=cmdxslBDtFE BMPs for Washing and Steam Cleaning Vehicles / Equipment / Building Structures tinyurl.com/59ms2ck7 berm around shop catch basin covered missing containment berm missing ground cover

Flip Book for Construction Contractors

Summary: Flip Book Information Template for Municipal Construction Managment Overview for Construction Contractors, Eastern Washington outreach and education for municipal stormwater management, photos of construction

Add Logo(s) and delete text
Municipal Stormwater
Management Overview
For ConstrucÆŸon Contractors
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Purpose & Disclaimer
Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control
· SWPPP
· TESC Tips
· Site Log Book
· Good Housekeeping
· Prohibited Discharge
· Perimeter Controls
· Stabilize Site
· Inlet and Outlet ProtecƟon
· Establish Site Access
Low Impact Development (LID)
· Why is LID important?
· LID Principles
Underground InjecÆŸon Control (UIC)
· Why are UICs Important?
Best Management PracÆŸces (BMPs)
· Why are BMPs important?
· Common BMPs
Municipal Stormwater Codes
PURPOSE & DISCLAIMER
The purpose of this flip book is to assist in the
protecÆŸon of water quality from sources of polluÆŸon.
This booklet contains informaÆŸon about temporary
erosion and sediment control (TESC), low impact
development (LID), underground injecÆŸon control
(UIC), and best management pracÆŸces (BMPs). This
informaÆŸon includes ways to prevent and correct
some of the most commonly observed concerns on
construcÆŸon sites as well as the importance of each
pracÆŸce.
This document does not include all possible pracÆŸces
but rather highlights some of the most common. For
more informaÆŸon, reference the weblinks on the back
page of this document.
TEMPORARY EROSION &
SEDIMENT CONTROL (TESC)
Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plans
outline pracƟces for prevenƟng sediment runoff from
construcÆŸon sites through the use of man-made
structures, land management techniques, or natural
processes. The ConstrucÆŸon Stormwater General
Permit requires a CerƟfied Erosion and Sediment
Control Lead (CESCL) to inspect sites. The link below
provides more informaÆŸon about becoming a CESCL.
This secÆŸon provides highlights from the CESCL
training course.
hƩps://ecology.wa.gov/RegulaƟons-Permits/Permits-
cerƟficaƟons/CerƟfied-erosion-sediment-control
Replace and/or delete items in
green text on the cover as well as
pages 35 and 36 with information
that is specific to your jurisdiction.
Then change text color to black.
WHY IS TESC IMPORTANT?
UnmiÆŸgated site development can result in soil
erosion that can adversely impact adjacent property,
infrastructure, and environmental and recreaÆŸonal
resources. EffecƟve erosion and sediment control
(ESC) BMPs on construcÆŸon sites can greatly reduce
undesirable environmental impacts and costs.
MunicipaliÆŸes may apply escalaÆŸng enforcement
measures to developers who fail to implement proper
erosion and sediment control procedures. Not
complying with municipal codes can result in project
delays, fines, or even imprisonment.
SWPPP
A stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) details the
BMPs used to avoid environmental loss and degradation
from poorly managed construction activity. A TESC plan
must address the following elements, which are consistent
with the thirteen SWPPP elements outlined in Special
Condition S9 of Ecology’s Construction Stormwater General
Permit and in Chapter 7 Construction Stormwater Pollution
Prevention of the Ecology Stormwater Management
Manual for Eastern Washington (SWMMEW).
· Element 1: Mark Clearing Limits
· Element 2: Establish ConstrucƟon Access
· Element 3: Control Flow Rates
· Element 4: Install Sediment Controls
· Element 5: Stabilize Soils
· Element 6: Protect Slopes
· Element 7: Protect Drain Inlets
· Element 8: Stabilize Channels and Outlets
· Element 9: Control Pollutants
· Element 10: Control Dewatering
· Element 11: Maintain BMPs
· Element 12: Manage Project
· Element 13: Protect LID BMPs
TESC TIPS
1. Budget for Temporary BMPs
Purchase – InstallaÆŸon – Maintenance – Removal
Factor in labor costs.
2. Grade and Excavate in Dry Season
Dry season is May 1st – October 1st
Phase construcÆŸon to preserve naÆŸve
vegetaÆŸon and reduce exposure.
3. Use Your SWPPP
Review – Reference – Revise
Keep SWPPP posted on-site at all ÆŸmes.
4. Keep Up-to-Date Records
Log Books – Reports – Maintenance – InspecÆŸon
Forms
Required by Department of Ecology and
JurisdicÆŸons
5. Protect Permanent Stormwater Controls
Ponds – Treatment Systems – Low Impact
Development (LID)
Reduce the need for maintenance at final
inspecÆŸon.
SITE LOG BOOK
Keep ongoing records of:
Changes to TESC plans
BMP implementaÆŸon
BMP maintenance or replacement
Visual inspecÆŸons
All relevant field notes
Spill informaÆŸon (date, ÆŸme, amount, locaÆŸon,
material, clean-up method, noƟficaƟons made,
and disposal)
Discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and
sampling
GOOD HOUSEKEEPING
Keep site clean.
Regularly inspect and maintain BMPs.
Cover and store hazardous materials (use
secondary containment).
Use concrete washout controls.
Follow solid waste BMPs.
Hold regular tailgate check-ins with crew.
Have spill kit on site.
Looking for photos to go here
PROHIBITED DISCHARGE
· Untreated construction stormwater over 25 NTUs
· Washout from concrete (slurry), stucco, paint,
and concrete form release oils
· Soaps or solvents used for vehicle or equipment
washing
· Equipment leaks and toxic substances from a spill
· Wheel wash wastewater
· Sediment track-out from vehicles
PERIMETER CONTROLS
Proper installaÆŸon is key:
– Key in and backfill to prevent runoff from
going under silt fences.
– Space support posts a maximum of 6 feet
apart.
– Overlap adjacent fence secƟons generously
to prevent escape of runoff.
Mark project area correctly.
Perform required maintenance.
Add BMP reinforcement for sites with high flow
or wind potenÆŸal.
Select BMPs by filtraƟon and retenƟon needs.
Consider public safety.
Use BMPs in combinaÆŸon.
STABILIZE SITE
Minimize exposed areas.
Preserve naÆŸve vegetaÆŸon.
Phase grading and excavaÆŸon.
Minimize slope length and pitch whenever
possible.
Stabilize slopes.
Cover stockpiles.
Use BMPs in combinaÆŸon.
INLET AND OUTLET PROTECTION
Install early in project.
Perform required maintenance; inspect regularly.
Inlet ProtecÆŸon BMPs:
Inserts/socks
Coir pads
Bio-bags/sand bags
Compost socks
Outlet ProtecÆŸon BMPs:
– Rip rap
– Sediment fence
– WaƩles/socks/sand bags
Use protecÆŸon BMPs as last line of defense.
ESTABLISH SITE ACCESS
Install stabilized pad 12-inch thick of 4-inch to
8-inch quarry spalls, or a 4-inch course of asphalt
treated base, or use exisÆŸng pavement at all site
entrances and exits.
Install geotexÆŸle fabric underlayment beneath
spalls.
Do not use crushed concrete.
Use wheel wash when a stabilized pad fails to
prevent sediment track-out.
Sweep track-out as necessary (at least daily).
Inspect site access regularly, especially aÅŒer large
storm events.
LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID)
Low impact development applies stormwater
and land use management approaches that strive
to imitate natural processes by emphasizing
conservaÆŸon, uÆŸlizing on-site natural features,
site planning, and distributed stormwater
management pracÆŸces in the project’s design.
Developers are encouraged to use LID techniques
and non-structural methods to minimize impervious
surfaces and disturbing naÆŸve soils and vegetaÆŸon.
Factor in site condiÆŸons and long-term maintenance
when considering using LID approaches.
ConstrucÆŸon Stormwater General and Municipal
Permit Requirements:
Use and maintain erosion and sediment controls
on areas that drain to infiltraƟon BMPs. Restore
BMPs by removing sediment and, if applicable,
replace sediment-laden soils with those meeÆŸng
the BMP’s design specificaÆŸons.
LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (CONT.)
Keep construcƟon equipment and foot traffic off
infiltraƟon BMPs to avoid compacƟon. Similarly,
protect landscaped and protected natural areas
from compacÆŸon by construcÆŸon equipment.
Clean permeable pavements fouled with
sediments as well as those failing SWMMEW or
manufacture infiltraƟon tests.
WHY IS LID IMPORTANT?
LID improves stormwater management and protects
surface waters. Installing LID systems can result in
cleaner air and water, as well as enhance flood
protecÆŸon, habitat, and green spaces.
LID may help meet or, in some cases, completely
saƟsfy Ecology’s requirements for runoff water
quality treatment (Core Element #5) and flow
control (Core Element #6).
LID PRINCIPLES
Follow the key principles of LID for site design,
construcÆŸon, and long-term maintenance:
Preserve naÆŸve vegetaÆŸon.
Protect criÆŸcal areas (e.g., wetlands, groundwater
recharge areas, flood-prone areas, geologically
unstable areas, and habitat conservaÆŸon areas).
Minimize surfaces that prevent water from
seeping into the ground.
Minimize disturbance and compacÆŸon of site
soils.
Preserve exisƟng flow paths.
Infiltrate stormwater runoff.
Disperse stormwater.
UÆŸlize natural surfaces.
UÆŸlize small-scale, distributed LID BMPs.
UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC)
Stormwater Underground InjecÆŸon Control wells
are structures used to direct stormwater runoff
underground, usually under the force of gravity.
UIC wells consist of:
A hole whose depth exceeds its largest surface
dimension.
An underground fluid distribuƟon system (e.g.,
perforated pipes or dry wells) to distribute the
stormwater below ground.
WHY ARE UICS IMPORTANT?
UIC wells are another approach to managing
stormwater runoff, which includes the added benefit
of replenishing groundwaters. As such, federal and
state regulaÆŸons govern the use of UIC wells to
prevent groundwater contaminaÆŸon. UIC wells not
designed, operated, and maintained according to
these laws may result in penalÆŸes, including
prevenÆŸng further use of the well.
WHY ARE UICS IMPORTANT? (CONT.)
UIC wells require frequent inspecÆŸon and
preventaÆŸve maintenance to ensure they perform as
intended. As such, UIC wells require protecÆŸon from
runoff with sediment generated during construcƟon
as it could quickly prevent infiltraƟon. If necessary,
remove debris and sediment to eliminate the buildup
of materials that could prevent infiltraƟon. Also see
Inlet and Outlet ProtecÆŸon on Page 11 for addiÆŸonal
ways to protect drywells during construcÆŸon.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS)
Best Management PracÆŸces consist of measures,
approved by the Department of Ecology, used to
prevent or reduce the release of pollutants and other
adverse impacts (e.g., high flows) to surface and
groundwaters. ConstrucÆŸon stormwater BMPs may
be used individually or required in combinaÆŸon. They
can be structural (e.g., silt fence, wheel wash, seƩling
ponds) or nonstructural (e.g., street sweeping, source
control polluÆŸon prevenÆŸon measures, maintenance
procedures, prohibited pracÆŸces).
This secÆŸon introduces common BMPs uÆŸlized during
construcÆŸon. InformaÆŸon about the BMPs included in
this document can be found at the QRL
code on this page. QRL codes for each
BMP are provided on the subsequent
pages, with more informaÆŸon about
installaÆŸon and maintenance pracÆŸces.
WHY ARE BMPS IMPORTANT?
Unmanaged runoff during a project’s construcÆŸon
phase can harm surface and groundwaters,
vegetaÆŸon, habitat, property, and infrastructure.
Avoiding these harms requires pre-project planning,
including the gathering of site-specific informaƟon
based on the site’s characterisÆŸcs. It also requires
ongoing site awareness and diligence during the
construcÆŸon phase, including monitoring weather
forecasts, proper installaÆŸon and maintenance
of BMPs, and polluÆŸon prevenÆŸon pracÆŸces.
CollecÆŸvely, these acÆŸons can contribute to
reducing construcÆŸon-related impacts on the site
and surrounding areas.
Used properly, BMPs provide erosion and sediment
control, provide polluÆŸon prevenÆŸon, minimize
unwanted compacƟon, and protect on- and off-site
infrastructure, property, and natural areas.
COMMON BMPS
BMP C233E Silt Fence
Silt fence reduces the transport
of coarse sediment from a
construcÆŸon site by providing
a temporary physical barrier to
sediment and reducing the runoff
velociƟes of overland flow.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C106E Wheel Wash
Wheel washes reduce the amount of
sediment transported onto paved
roads by washing dirt from the wheels
of motor vehicles prior to the motor
vehicles leaving the construcÆŸon site.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C105E Stabilized ConstrucÆŸon Access
Stabilized construcÆŸon entrances
reduce the amount of sediment
transported onto paved roads by
vehicles or equipment. This is done by
construcÆŸng a stabilized pad of quarry
spalls at entrances and exits for
construcÆŸon sites.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C107E ConstrucÆŸon Road / Parking Area
StabilizaÆŸon
Stabilizing roads, parking areas, and
other on-site vehicle transportaÆŸon
routes immediately aÅŒer grading re-
duces erosion caused by construcÆŸon
traffic or stormwater runoff.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C103E High-Visibility Fence
High-visibility fencing:
Restricts clearing to approved
limits;
Prevents disturbance of sensiÆŸve
areas, their buffers, and other
areas required to be leŌ
undisturbed;
Limits construcƟon traffic to designated
construcÆŸon entrances, exits, or internal roads;
and
Protects areas where marking with survey tape
may not provide adequate protecÆŸon.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C235E WaƩles
WaƩles are temporary erosion and
sediment control barriers consisÆŸng of
straw, compost, or other material that
is wrapped in biodegradable tubular
plasÆŸc or similar encasing material.
They reduce the velocity and can
spread the flow of rill and sheet runoff and
can capture and retain sediment.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C209E Outlet ProtecÆŸon
Outlet protecÆŸon prevents scour at
conveyance outlets and minimizes the
potenÆŸal for downstream erosion by
reducing the velocity of concentrated
stormwater flows.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C201E Grass Lined Channels
Grass lined channels are channels with
a vegetaÆŸve lining for conveyance of
runoff to help prevent the transport
of sediment and erosion.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C202 Riprap Channel Lining
Riprap channel lining is used when
natural soils or vegetated stabilized
soils in a channel are not adequate
to prevent channel erosion.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C241E Sediment Pond (Temporary)
Sediment ponds are temporary ponds
used during construcÆŸon to remove
sediment from runoff originaƟng from
disturbed areas of the site. Sediment
ponds are typically designed to
remove sediment no smaller than
medium silt (0.02 millimeters). Consequently,
they usually reduce turbidity only slightly.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C207E Check Dams
ConstrucÆŸon of check dams across
a swale or ditch reduces the velocity
of concentrated flow and dissipates
energy at the check dam.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C101E Preserving Natural VegetaÆŸon
The purpose of preserving natural
vegetaÆŸon is to reduce erosion
wherever pracÆŸcable. LimiÆŸng site
disturbance is the single most effecƟve
method for reducing erosion. For
example, conifers can hold up to about
50% of all rain that falls during a storm. Up to 20% to
30% of this rain may never reach the ground but is
taken up by the tree or evaporates. Another benefit is
that the rain held in the tree can be released slowly
to the ground aÅŒer the storm.
COMMON BMPS (CONT.)
BMP C162 Scheduling
Sequencing a construcÆŸon project can
reduce the amount and duraÆŸon of
soil exposed to erosion by wind, rain,
runoff, and vehicle tracking.
MUNICIPAL STORMWATER CODES
The EWA MS4 Phase II Permit requires implemenÆŸng
and enforcing programs to reduce pollutants in
stormwater from construcÆŸon acÆŸviÆŸes that disturb
one…

Brochure for planners, engineers and review staff

Summary: Brochure Template Instructions, Construction site compliance with Muni Phase II Permit EW, Developer, planner, engineer, plan review staff information, information for designers to comply with Muni Permit

FOR MORE INFORMATION
CONTACT US
MUNICIPAL STORMWATER CODE
REQUIREMENTS
Municipal stormwater code promotes public health,
safety, and welfare in compliance with state and
federal laws. The Eastern Washington Phase II
Municipal Stormwater Permit (Permit) requires
jurisdictions to develop and administer code to:
• Prohibit non-stormwater discharges into their
stormwater system.
• Require erosion and sediment controls, and other
construction-phase stormwater pollution controls.
• Require post-construction stormwater controls.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
FOR REDUCING ADVERSE IMPACTS
FROM STORMWATER RUNOFF
FROM DEVELOPMENT SITES
Best Management Practices (BMPs) include a
schedule of activities, prohibited practices,
maintenance procedures, and structural and/or
managerial practices approved by the Department of
Ecology that, when used singly or in combination,
prevent or reduce the release of pollutants and other
adverse impacts to receiving waters.
The Permit requires project proponents and
property owners to adhere to the Permit’s
minimum technical requirements. These include
BMP selection, design, installation, operation,
and maintenance standards for projects meeting
the threshold triggers in the SWMMEW and/or
[insert local standards/manuals].
Failure to adequately select, design, and install
required BMPs violates local code and may result in
penalties.
Bioinfiltration BMP in Eastern Washington.
MUNICIPAL STORMWATER
This brochure introduces topics essential to
stormwater design and includes resources for
engineers, development review staff, and land use
planners.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
[Insert Permittee’s Name] stormwater code can be
found here: [Insert stormwater code link].
Not complying with municipal codes can result in project
delays, fines, or even imprisonment.
TECHNICAL STANDARDS
The Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern
Washington (SWMMEW) [Insert Local Manual Title
or Delete] provides technical guidance in the design,
operation, and maintenance to control the quantity
and quality of stormwater runoff from development
projects in Eastern Washington.
Applying these measures can support achieving
compliance with state and federal water quality laws,
contributing to the protection of the beneficial uses of
surface and groundwaters.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SWMMEW: https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-
Permits/Guidance-technical-assistance/Stormwater-
permittee-guidance-resources/Stormwater-manuals
[Insert Local Manual Title or Delete]:
Provide link to local technical standards
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SWMMEW Chapter 1.5
Permit Appendix 1: https://ecology.wa.gov/DOE/
files/7f/7f049302-50bb-4b67-9724-1a43cd521922.pdf
Jurisdictions Logo
Name
Position
Phone Number
Email
Jurisdictions Logo
Name
Position
Phone Number
Email
Bioretention BMP in Eastern Washington.
Constructed stormwater wetland during construction.
[Jurisdiction Name][Jurisdiction Address][City, WA Zip Code][Add Jurisdiction Phone Number]Developed for Engineers,
Development Review Staff,
& Land Use Planners
Municipal
Stormwater
Management
Requirements Overview
Replace and/or delete items in red
boxes with information that is
specific to your jurisdiction.
DEVELOPMENT OF STORMWATER
SITE & EROSION CONTROL PLANS
A Stormwater Site Plan (SSP) contains the technical
information and analysis necessary for regulatory
agencies to evaluate a proposed development
project for compliance. Contents of the SSP vary
with the type and size of the project, individual site
characteristics, and local jurisdictional requirements.
Developing a SSP consists of the following steps:
1. Collect and analyze information on existing
conditions.
2. Prepare preliminary development layout.
3. Perform off-site analysis.
4. Determine applicable SWMMEW core elements.
5. Prepare a permanent stormwater control plan.
6. Select construction stormwater pollution
prevention BMPs (projects may require a
Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan).
7. Complete the SSP.
8. Check compliance with all applicable SWMMEW
core elements.
The Permit requires proactively managing erosion-
related risks during construction. Developers must
consider each of the following elements of pollution
prevention to determine appropriate controls for the
project site:
1. Clearing Limits
2. Construction Access
3. Flow Rates
4. Sediment Controls
5. Soil Stabilization
6. Slope Protection
7. Drain Inlet Protection
8. Channel and Outlet Stabilization
9. Pollutant Controls
10. Dewatering
11. BMP Maintenance
12. Project Management
13. Low-Impact Development Facility Protection
UNDERGROUND INJECTION
CONTROL
Underground Injection Control (UIC) wells are
structures used to direct stormwater runoff
underground, usually under the force of gravity.
UIC wells consist of:
• A dug hole whose depth exceeds its largest
surface dimension.
• An underground fluid distribution system (e.g.,
perforated pipes).
Examples of stormwater UIC wells: drywells, an
infiltration trench containing perforated pipe,
bioretention systems with a perforated pipe below
the treatment soil, and stormwater infiltration
chamber systems.
The Department of Ecology regulates UIC wells
under the statewide UIC program to prevent
groundwater contamination. Owners of
stormwater UICs must apply the guidance in
the SWMMEW and submit UIC registration
applications 60 days prior to construction to
allow for sufficient review time.
All UIC wells not operated in accordance with
the law may result in a violation, including
action for injunctive relief.
Drywells are an example of a UIC.
LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
Low Impact Development (LID) applies
stormwater and land use management strategies
that strive to mimic natural processes utilizing the
following principles:
• Preserve native vegetation.
• Protect critical areas.
• Minimize impervious surfaces.
• Minimize grading and compaction of site soils.
• Preserve existing flow paths.
• Infiltrate stormwater runoff.
• Disperse stormwater.
• Utilize natural surfaces.
• Utilize small-scale, distributed LID BMPs.
Examples of practices adhering to these
principles include: bioretention, rain gardens,
dispersion, and permeable pavements.
Implementing LID principles and practices
manages runoff in a way that reduces the impact
of built areas and promotes ecological functions.
The Permit requires jurisdictions to implement a
policy encouraging project proponents to maintain
natural drainages to the Maximum Extent
Practicable. This includes minimizing the disturbance
of native soils and vegetation, reducing the total
amount of impervious surfaces, non-structural
preventive actions, and pollutant source reduction
approaches. In utilizing LID approaches, consider
site conditions and long-term maintenance.
Bioretention cells are an example of LID BMPs.
INFILTRATION
The SWMMEW defines infiltration as the downward
movement of water from the land surface to the
subsoil. Infiltration BMP design allows stormwater
runoff to soak into the ground as a means of filtering
out pollutants and recharging groundwater.
Examples of infiltration BMPs: dispersion,
bioinfiltration, drywells, infiltration ponds and
trenches, bioretention, and permeable pavement.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SWMMEW Chapter 3 (SSP) & Chapter 7
(ECP): WSDOT Temporary Erosion and Sediment
Control Manual:
https://wsdot.wa.gov/engineering-standards/all-
manuals-and-standards/manuals/temporary-erosion-
and-sediment-control-manual
[Insert link to local code/regulations/resources, if
applicable]ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SWMMEW Appendix 3-D: Guidance on Low Impact
Development Site Planning Principles and Design
Strategies
[Insert link to local code/regulations/resources,
if applicable][Jurisdictions Name] local code/regulations/
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SWMMEW Chapter 5.6: Defines site suitability,
treatment requirements, and stormwater discharges
to UIC well design criteria.
Ecology’s UIC Program: https://ecology.wa.gov/
Regulations-Permits/Guidance-technical-assistance/
Underground-injection-control-program
UIC Registration: https://ecology.wa.gov/
Regulations-Permits/Guidance-technical-assistance/
Underground-injection-control-program/Register-UIC
-wells-online
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SWMMEW Chapter 5.4 and 6.3: [Insert link to local
code/regulations/resources, if applicable]SWMMEW Chapters 5.4 and 6.3, as well as/or
[insert local standards/manuals] include design and
installation information for infiltration BMPs. Some
infiltration BMPs qualify as UIC wells and must follow
requirements of the statewide UIC program (see UIC
section for more information).
Dispersion BMPs allow runoff to infiltrate over a large area.
Runoff infiltrates through permeable pavement.

Template Penalty Matrix and Guidance for source control site inspection

Summary: Enforcement calculator, penalty matrix, source control, water quality

Enforcement Penalty Matrix Guidance
1. Did the violation result in a public health risk?
a.“no” – there is no evidence to support a claim of public health risk or adverse health effects.
b.“possibly” – evidence supports a claim of public health risk and there is a plausible connection
between this violation and health effect.
c.“probably” – evidence supports a claim of public health risk and there is a likely connection
between this violation and health effect.
d.“definitely” – there is direct evidence linking public health risk or adverse effects with the violation.
Answer "a" if there was no discharge or because the violation has no apparent health effects.
Answer “b” if there is a general understanding that the violation could cause a public health risk, even
if direct evidence is not available. Answer b if the violation has not left the private system.
Answer “c” is there is evidence that contact or exposure to the violation could result in public health
effects. Answer c of the violation has impacted the public drainage system.
Answer “d” if there is evidence that the violation is causing a definite health risk. Answer d if the
violation is evident at the outfall or surrounding area (e.g. beach closure).
2. Did the violation result in environmental damage or adversely impact infrastructure?
a.“no” if there is no evidence to support a claim of environmental or infrastructure damage.
b.“possibly” if environmental or infrastructure damage can be inferred from evidence or knowledge
of the effects of the violation.
c.“probably” if there is evidence to support a claim of environmental or infrastructure damage and
there is a likely connection between the violation and the damage/impairment.
d.“definitely” if there is direct evidence linking environmental or infrastructure damage with the
violation.
Answer “a” if there is no evidence to say that environmental or infrastructure damage occurred or if the
violation has no environmental impact or impact on infrastructure.
Answer “b” if the violation has the potential to impact the environment or infrastructure. There does not
have to be evidence of damage to support b, but rather a general understanding that the violation could
affect the environment or infrastructure. Note: Having to clean out the infrastructure quantifies as
damage to it. Answer b if the violation did not leave the private system.
Answer “c” if there is evidence that environmental or infrastructure damage occurred that was likely
due to the violation. For example, if there was extensive cleaning done to the system or if structures had
to be repaired as a result of the violation. Answer c if the violation entered the public drainage system.
Answer “d” if there is direct evidence of environmental or extensive infrastructure damage due to the
violation. For example, if DNR has established that a fish kill was the result of spill or if there was
permanent infrastructure damage that required structural repair. Answer d if the violation is evident at
the outfall or surrounding area.
3. Was the action a willful and knowing violation?
a.“no” if the violator obviously did not know that the action or inaction constituted a violation.
b.“possibly” if the violator should have known.
c."probably” if it is likely the violator knew.
d.“definitely” if the violator clearly knew or was previously informed by the probing inspectors.
Answer “a” if the violator obviously did not know that the action was a violation (note: Inspector should
use best professional judgment in applying this criteria).
Answer “b” if the violator is a business owner for whom wastewater disposal is a primary or routine
activity, (such as carpet cleaning) even if they have not been visited before.
Answer “c” if the violator likely knew that the violation was illegal. For example, if they have been
visited before, but there is not documentation regarding that specific violation addressed in the file.
Answer “d” if there is documentation of a previous correspondence with the business documenting the
specific violation
or if the violation is so egregious that a reasonable person would understand that it’s illegal, such as
disposing of hazardous waste into a toilet or drain, rather than paying for disposal.
4. Was the responsible party unresponsive in correcting the violation?
a.“no” if the violation was corrected as soon as the responsible party learned of it.
b.“possibly” if the violation was corrected in a less timely and cooperative fashion.
c.“probably” if the responsible person made some attempt to correct the problem, but did not correct
it.
d.“definitely” if the responsible party made no attempt to correct the violation.
Answer a if the violator was timely and cooperative in resolving the violation.
Answer b if ultimately, the violation was resolved, but was done in a less timely and cooperative manner
than requested by the Inspector.
Answer c if the violation was not fully resolved. For example, if the violator cleaned part, but not all of
the drainage system.
Answer d if the violator made no attempt to resolve the violation. For example, if the City had to perform
the work at the violator’s expense (in which case a cost recovery should also be done).
5. Was the violation a result of improper operation or inadequate maintenance?
(i.e. TESC1 plans, PPP2, O&M3 manual, DCP4).
a.“no” if the violation was not the result of improper operation or inadequate maintenance.
b."possibly" if the facility has an O&M, DCP, PPP, or TESC plan or manual but it is out of date or
inadequate.
c.“probably” if there is no O&M, DCP, PPP, or TESC plan or manual and the violation would have
been less severe if the plan were developed and followed.
d."definitely" if the facility has no plans or did not follow its plan AND the violation was clearly the
result of improper operation or maintenance.
Note:
does not issue permits or require O&M plans, TESC plans, etc. When ranking this criteria,
should consider procedures, BMP maintenance, spill plans, etc.
Answer a if the discharge had nothing to do with routine maintenance or improper operation,
Answer b if the facility has or plans in place, they were out of date or inadequate to address the violation.
Answer c if there are no or plans in place on site to address the violation, or there is no routine
maintenance plan for the site and the violation would have been less severe if there had been, such as
routine drainage system cleaning or BMPs on site.
Answer d if there are no plans or BMP’s in place and the violation was a direct result of no BMP’s or
plans.
6. Did the responsible party fail to obtain and comply with the necessary permits, certifications and
approvals from the agency with jurisdiction to operate at the time of the violation?
a.“no” if the paperwork was complete and appropriate for the job or task that caused the violation.
b.“possibly” if the responsible party obtain and received approval for some but not all of the required
permit(s).
c.“probably” if the responsible party obtained some but not all of the required permit(s) and did not
receive approvals for the job or task that caused the violation.
d.“definitely” if the responsible party either did not obtain the necessary permits or did obtain permits
but did not comply with their conditions.
Note:
does not issue permits. This question relates to necessary permits, certifications and approvals
that would affect stormwater BMPs and/or drainage work.
Answer a if there are no permits that correspond to the violation.
Answer b if the site did not get all permits necessary and the violation was a result of this.
Answer c if the responsible party didn’t get all the necessary permits and work was done outside the
scope of the permit or they didn’t receive approvals for the job or task.
Answer d if there were no permits and work was done that caused a violation. For example, if the builder
did not get permits and the site has an illicit connection.
7. Did anyone benefit economically from non-compliance?
a.“no” if it is clear that no one gained an economic benefit.
b.“possibly” if someone might have benefited.
c.“probably” if anyone benefited, but the benefit is not quantifiable.
d.“definitely” if the economic benefit is quantifiable.
Answer a if the violation had no economic benefit to the responsible party, such as an unknown illicit
connection. .
Answer b if the responsible party could have benefitted financially from operating improperly.
Answer c if it is clear there are benefits to operating improperly, but they are difficult to quantify (because
there are no bids or paper trail to quantify).
Answer d if there is a distinct quantifiable benefit. Answer d for issues such as drainage maintenance
work, or improper waste disposal, where the benefits are distinctly quantifiable and the responsible party
may have received bids to facilitate their decision.
8. Is this violation a repeat violation ?
a.“no” to indicate that there have been no prior violations.
b.“possibly” to indicate that there has been one prior violation.
c.“probably” to indicate that there have been two prior violations.
d.“definitely” to indicate that there have been three or more prior violations.
Note: In this context, violation = Stormwater Code related NOV. Inspectors should check Hanson or
with DPD, especially when issuing an NOV to a contractor.
Answer a if there have been no prior NOVs within the last 5 years.
Answer b if there has been one prior NOV within the last 5 years.
Answer c if there have been two prior NOVs within the last 5 years.
Answer d if the responsible party has been issued multiple NOV’s within the last 5 years.

WSC Web Landing Page for Chapter 5: Conducting Business/Site Inspections

Summary: Landing Page for Chapter 5 Developing a Business / Site Inspection Program Guidance Manual

Chapter 5 of the Source Control (Business/Site) Inspection Program Guidance Manual (
PDF
addresses the following topics:
Permit Requirements
Equipment and Materials
Guidance for New Inspectors
Inspection Process
The inspection process guidance includes:
Pre-inspection activities
Conducting the inspection
Follow-up activities
Source Control Online Resource Library (SCORL)
Supplemental resources developed for this project related to
Chapter 5
include:
Common
ctions from the Source Control Inspection Form Example
have also been translated into the following languages:
Additional supplemental resources for
Chapter 5
include: