Skip to content

2021 QAPP for Business Education and Outreach Effectiveness Study

Summary: Eastern Washington stormwater effectiveness study, QAPP evaluate effectiveness, business education and outreach efficacy, City of Ellensburg Education and Outreach Study business outreach efficacy

3.0
Background
3. 1
The Stormwater Education and Outreach (E&O) Program
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of an E&O program for the City of Ellensburg and
measure adoption of targeted behaviors by the target audience. The stormwater pollutants of
concern addressed by the E&O Program are cooking-related F.O.G. and wash water. F.O.G. and
wash water are commonly created at restaurants and can create an illicit discharge if not disposed
of properly. The E&O program will therefore focus on restaurants located within the city limits of
Ellensburg, Washington, specifically fast-food establishments. The target audience of the study
includes employees of the fast-food restaurants identified for this study.
Employees at fast-food restaurants are responsible for the maintenance and cleaning during their
shift. This process can include maintenance of grease traps, grease interceptors, mopping, and
disposal of waste materials, such as F.O.G. and wash water. Ideally, a restaurant employee would
dispose of these materials according to BMPs. If the employee is unaware of proper disposal
practices, these materials may find their way into the storm system via storm drains on the
restaurant premises via direct dumping, improper dumpster maintenance, or by other means. The
targeted behavior which the E&O program plans to address is proper maintenance and disposal of
F.O.G and wash water.
An E&O program addressing F.O.G. and wash water was implemented in 2013 and is no longer
active. The E&O program involved delivering a flier to local fast-food restaurants to inform
restaurant personnel about the negative effects that improper F.O.G. and wash water disposal has
on stormwater (see Appendix B). Due to high turn-around rates of employment in fast-food
restaurants and the growth of the number of operating businesses within the City, an updated
version of this program will be implemented and evaluated for this study.
3. 2
Problem Description
The 2019-2024 Eastern Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit requires permittees to
prohibit, through ordinances or other regulatory mechanism, non-stormwater discharges into the
MS4 (Washington State Department of Ecology, 2019). Additionally, permittees are required to
provide information to businesses, such as restaurants, regarding impacts and prevention of illicit
discharges, proper management and disposal of waste, management of dumpsters and wash water,
and the use of hazardous cleaning supplies and other materials. An E&O program targeting
restaurants specifically was implemented in 2013 (see Section 3.1) and will be re-implemented to
target fast-food restaurants on proper management and disposal ofF.O.G. and wash water.
F.O.G. produced at restaurants can be introduced into the storm system by direct dumping, leaking
or overflowing waste containers, or overflow from grease traps or interceptors (Husain, et al.,
2014). Once the material reaches pipes, it tends to deposit onto the walls of the pipe. Over time,
the deposits form partial or full blockages of the pipe, which then can cause localized flooding and
damage nearby structures (O'Shields, 2019). F.O.G. can also create acidic conditions within the
pipe, causing corrosion of metal pipes or dissolving concrete pipes (Fairfax County, n.d.). IfF.O.G.
continue downstream to a receiving water, the material can deplete dissolved oxygen content,
suffocating aquatic life (Environmental Protection Agency, 2020). The material can also coat
animals using the receiving water body as a habitat with oil, reducing their ability to obtain food
7/20/2021
Pagel2

2014 – 2019 Ellensburg Technical Evaluation Report Street Sweeping

Summary: Technical Evaluation Report Street Sweeping and Catch Basin Cleaning comparison, Road maintenance effectiveness studies for stormwater control. City of Ellensburg effectiveness study

Eastern Washington
Stormwater Effectiveness Studies
Technical Evaluation Report (TER)
Street Sweeping and Catch Basin Cleaning
Comparison
Study Classification: Operational BMPs
December 2020
Prepared For:
Jon Morrow, Stormwater Manager
City of Ellensburg
Public Works Department
501 N Anderson Street
Ellensburg, WA Zip 98926
509.925.6819
Prepared By:
Osborn Consulting, Inc.
101 S. Stevens Street, Suite 103
Spokane, WA 99201
509.867.3654
FINAL TER
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
December 2020
Page | ii
QAPP and TER Publication Information
The project Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and the Technical Evaluation Report (TER)
will
stored
and
accessible
the
public
the
following
weblink:
https://www.ci.ellensburg.wa.us/. For questions regarding the Proposal, please contact Jon
Morrow by email [email protected] or phone 509.925.6819.
QAPP and TER Author Contact Information
Aimee Navickis-Brasch, P.E., PhD
Engineering Manager
Osborn Consulting, Inc.
101 S. Stevens Street, Suite 103
Spokane, Washington, 99201
[email protected]
509.867.3654
Taylor Hoffman, P.E.
Stormwater Research Engineer
Osborn Consulting, Inc.
101 S. Stevens Street, Suite 103
Spokane, Washington, 99201
[email protected]
509.867.3654
FINAL TER
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
December 2020
Page | iii
Document History
The study documents were developed following the Eastern Washington (EWA) Detailed Study
Design Proposal and Quality Assurance Project Plan Template for Operational Best Management
Practices (BMPs). A copy of the template is located on the Washington Stormwater Center’s
website at the following web link: https://www.wastormwatercenter.org/ew-effectiveness-studies/
The Detailed Study Design Proposal (Proposal) was submitted to Ecology by Jon Morrow on June
28, 2017. Ecology approved the Proposal via email to Jon Morrow on November 8th, 2017.
Appendix A of the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) contains a copy of the approval letter
along with Ecology’s comments on the Proposal. Appendix B of the QAPP contains a summary
of responses to Ecology’s comments including how the comments were incorporated into QAPP.
The draft QAPP was reviewed by members of the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) in January
2018. Appendix C of the QAPP contains a summary of the TAG’s comments along with a
summary of response to these comments including how the comments were addressed in the
QAPP. The final QAPP was submitted to Ecology prior to the May 8, 2018 deadline for their
review and comment. Appendix D of the QAPP contains a copy of Ecology’s approval letter of
the QAPP and a summary of Ecology’s comments along with responses to the comments including
how the comments were incorporated into the final QAPP document. The revised version of the
QAPP was submitted on August 1, 2018.
In June 2020, the QAPP was revised as noted in the Appendix J. Summary of Revisions Table.
Generally, the revisions included updating the project schedule and the Technical Advisory Group.
The revisions were approved by Ecology in June 2020.
The study started in October 2018 and the last data was collected in April 2020. The draft
Technical Evaluation Report (TER) was presented and submitted to the TAG in July 2020 for
review and comment. The TAG comments were discussed at an August 2020 TAG meeting.
Appendix Q of the TER contains a summary of the TAG’s comments along with a summary of
response to these comments including how the comments were addressed in this document. The
final TER was submitted to Ecology in December 2020.
FINAL TER
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
December 2020
Page | i
Distribution List
The distribution list includes each party who will receive a copy of the TER.
Name, Title
Organization
Contact Information:
Telephone, E-mail
Jon Morrow
Stormwater Manager
City of Ellensburg
509.925.8619
[email protected]
Kathy Sattler, Laboratory
Project Manager
Anatek Laboratories
509.838.3999
[email protected]
Aimee Navickis-Brasch,
Engineering Manager
Osborn Consulting, Inc.
509.343.8515
[email protected]
Taylor Hoffman
Stormwater Engineer
Osborn Consulting, Inc.
509.343.8477
[email protected]
Jeff Wiemer, Regional
Stormwater Coordinator
Asotin County, City of
Asotin, and the City of
Clarkston
509.243.2071 ext. 1430
[email protected]
Bill Aukett, Stormwater
Program Manager
City of Moses Lake
509.764.3792
[email protected]
Trey George,
Stormwater Permit
Coordinator
City of Spokane
509.625.7908
[email protected]
Chad Philips,
Stormwater Engineer
City of Spokane Valley
509.720.5013
[email protected]
Brian Morgenroth,
Stormwater Coordinator
City of Walla Walla
509.524.4669
[email protected]
Jessica Shaw,
Utilities and Environmental
Manager
City of Wenatchee
509.888.7173
[email protected]
Andrea Jedel,
Municipal Stormwater
Permit Manager
Department of Ecology
509.575.2807
[email protected]
Karen Dinicola,
Phase 2-3a Gross Grant
Ecology Project Manager
Department of Ecology
360.407.6550
[email protected]
Doug Howie,
Reviewer Structural and
Operational BMPs
Department of Ecology
360.407.644
[email protected]
Brandi Lubliner,
Reviewer Monitoring
System Designs
Department of Ecology
360.407.7140
[email protected]
Nigel Pickering
Professor
Washington State
University
509.335.8624
[email protected]
FINAL TER
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
December 2020
Page | ii
1.0
Table of Contents
QAPP AND TER PUBLICATION INFORMATION ……………………………………………………………………………..II
DOCUMENT HISTORY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… III
DISTRIBUTION LIST ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. I
1.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………II
2.0
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4
3.0
INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6
3.1
INTRODUCTION TO THE OPERATIONAL BMP …………………………………………………………………………………… 6
3.2
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6
3.3
STUDY GOALS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10
3.4
STUDY DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10
3.5
STUDY LOCATION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14
4.0
OPERATIONAL BMP DESCRIPTION ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 16
5.0
SAMPLING PROCEDURES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 18
5.1
TYPES OF DATA COLLECTED ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 18
5.2
SAMPLE COLLECTION PROCESS AND DESIGN(S) …………………………………………………………………………….. 20
6.0
DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26
6.1
BIAS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26
6.2
PRECISION ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27
6.3
REPRESENTATIVENESS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28
6.4
COMPLETENESS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29
6.5
COMPARABILITY …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 30
6.6
SENSITIVITY ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 30
7.0
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 31
7.1
SEDIMENT CHARACTERIZATION …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 31
7.2
SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION RATE ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 35
7.3
WEATHER DATA …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 49
7.4
STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF DATASETS ……………………………………………………………………………………… 55
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND TRANSFERABILITY …………………………………………………………………….. 57
8.0
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING …………………………………….. 57
8.2
CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSFERABILITY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………………….. 59
9.0
CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 62
10.0 REFERENCES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 63
11.0
APPENDICES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 66
APPENDIX A SURVEY DATA ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 67
APPENDIX B RAW LAB DATA ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 68
APPENDIX C STREET & CATCH BASIN WEIGHT COLLECTED RAW DATA …………………………………………………… 69
APPENDIX D CATCH BASIN DEPTH RAW DATA ……………………………………………………………………………………… 70
APPENDIX E SUMP SOCK TARE WEIGHTS RAW DATA ……………………………………………………………………………… 71
APPENDIX F SIEVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY DATA ………………………………………………………………………………………. 72
APPENDIX G ORGANIC CONTENT & MOISTURE CONTENT SUMMARY ………………………………………………………. 73
APPENDIX H STREET SWEEPER SEDIMENT DATA SUMMARY …………………………………………………………………….. 74
FINAL TER
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
December 2020
Page | iii
APPENDIX I CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT WEIGHT SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………. 75
APPENDIX J CATCH BASIN DEPTH SUMMARY …………………………………………………………………………………………. 76
APPENDIX K CATCH BASIN SOCK SEDIMENT DATA SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………… 77
APPENDIX L WEATHER DATA DURING STUDY ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 78
APPENDIX M AUDIT RESULTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 79
APPENDIX N EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE RECORDS ………………………………………………………………………………. 80
APPENDIX O RELATIVE PERCENT DIFFERENCE RESULTS ………………………………………………………………………….. 81
APPENDIX P STATISTICAL ANALYSIS RESULTS ………………………………………………………………………………………… 82
APPENDIX Q TAG TER COMMENTS & RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ………………………………………………………….. 83
FINAL TER
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
August 2020
Page | 4
2.0
Executive Summary
Street sweeping and catch basin cleaning are operational best management practices (BMPs) that
are known to reduce the transport of sediment to receiving water bodies. In the EWA National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Phase
II Permit (MS4 Permit), catch basin cleaning is a required operations and maintenance (O&M)
practice. The permit-required frequency of catch basin inspections (and potential cleanings)
increased on December 31, 2018. Meeting these requirements creates a logistical and financial
challenge for some EWA permittees due primarily to winter climate conditions which can prohibit
catch basin cleaning for four months of the year. More frequent street sweeping may provide a
solution to meeting the new permit requirements. Specifically, studies have shown that street
sweeping can reduce the amount of sediment transported to catch basins during rainfall events. In
theory, this could reduce the accumulation rate of sediment in catch basins and subsequently the
frequency of which catch basins need to be cleaned.
The goals for this study were to 1) investigate whether the frequency of street sweeping
significantly influenced sediment accumulation in catch basins (and transport from catch basins)
during the dry season in a semiarid location, 2) recommend a combination of street sweeping and
catch basin cleaning procedures for achieving permit requirements for catch basin cleaning, and
3) use the study results to justify a condition in the next permit for O&M procedures that allows
street sweeping practices to offset the frequency of catch basin cleanings. These goals were
achieved by conducting a two-year study in the City of Ellensburg. The study area is a 1,065-feet
long section of SR 97 which includes four catch basins located on each side of the road that each
discharge runoff to a swale. During year one (2018), one side of the road (test site) was swept and
the catch…

QAPP for Ellensburg Street Sweeping and Catch Basin Cleaning Effectiveness study

Summary: Eastern Washington, Ellensburg, Street Sweeping effectiveness study QAPP, Compare street sweeping to catch basin cleaning study, road maintenance effectiveness study for stormwater controls

Eastern Washington
Stormwater Effectiveness Studies
Quality Assurance Project Plan
Street Sweeping and Catch Basin Cleaning
Comparison
Study Classification: Operational BMPs
August 1, 2018
Prepared For:
Jon Morrow, Stormwater Manager
City of Ellensburg
Public Works Department
501 N Anderson Street
Ellensburg, WA Zip 98926
509.925.6819
Prepared By:
HDR, Inc.
1401 E. Trent Ave., Suite 101
Spokane, WA 99202
509.343.8500
FINAL QAPP
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
8/1/2018
Page | ii
Proposal and QAPP Publication Information
This Detailed Study Design Proposal (Proposal) will be stored and accessible to the public at the
following weblink: https://www.ci.ellensburg.wa.us/. For questions regarding the Proposal, please
contact Jon Morrow by email [email protected] or phone 509.925.6819.
Principal Investigator Contact Information
Aimee Navickis-Brasch, P.E., PhDc
HDR, Inc.
Senior Stormwater Engineer
1401 E. Trent Avenue, Suite 101
Spokane, Washington, 99202
[email protected]
509.343.8515
Proposal Peer Review Contact Information
Roger Sutherland, P.E.
Cascade Water Resource, LLC
Principal Water Resource Engineer
5435 SW 188th Avenue
Aloha, Oregon 97078
[email protected]
503.704.0522
QAPP Author Contact Information
Aimee Navickis-Brasch, P.E., PhD
Senior Stormwater Research and Design Engineer
HDR, Inc.
1401 E. Trent Avenue, Suite 101
Spokane, Washington, 99202
[email protected]
509.343.8515
Taylor Hoffman, EIT
Stormwater Research Engineer
HDR, Inc.
1401 E. Trent Avenue, Suite 101
Spokane, Washington, 99202
[email protected]
509.343.8477
FINAL QAPP
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
8/1/2018
Page | iii
Document History
This document was developed following the Eastern Washington (EWA) Detailed Study Design
Proposal and Quality Assurance Project Plan Template for Operational Best Management
Practices (BMPs). A copy of the template is located on the City of Spokane Valley’s website at
the
following
web
link:
http://www.spokanevalley.org/content/6836/6914/8301/10121/default.aspx
The Detailed Study Design Proposal (Proposal) was submitted to Ecology by Jon Morrow on June
28, 2017. Ecology approved the Proposal via email to Jon Morrow on November 8th, 2017.
Appendix A contains a copy of the email along with Ecology’s comments on the Proposal.
Appendix B contains a summary of HDR’s responses to Ecology’s comments including how the
comments were incorporated into the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP).
The draft QAPP was reviewed by members of the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) in January
2018. Appendix C contains a summary of the TAG’s comments along with a summary of HDR’s
response to these comments including how the comments were addressed in this document. The
final QAPP was submitted to Ecology prior to the May 8, 2018 deadline for their review and
comment. Appendix D contains a copy of Ecology’s approval letter of the QAPP and a summary
of Ecology’s comments along with HDR’s responses to the comments including how the
comments were incorporated into the final QAPP document. The revised version of the QAPP was
submitted on August 1, 2018.
FINAL QAPP
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
8/1/2018
Page | i
QAPP Signature Page
Approved by:
Date
Jon Morrow, Lead Entity, City of Ellensburg
Date
Aimee Navickis-Brasch, Principal Investigator, HDR, Inc.
Date
Kathy Sattler, Anatek Laboratories Laboratory Project Manager
Date
Stephen Burchett, Budinger and Associates, Environmental Engineer Principal
Date
Ray Latham, Ecology, Municipal Stormwater Permit Manager
Date
Doug Howie, Ecology, Reviewer Structural and Operational BMP Studies
FINAL QAPP
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
8/1/2018
Page | ii
Distribution List
The distribution list includes each party who will receive a copy of the Ecology-approved QAPP.
Name, Title
Organization
Contact Information:
Telephone, E-mail
Jon Morrow
Stormwater Manager
City of Ellensburg
509.925.8619
[email protected]
Kathy Sattler, Laboratory
Project Manager
Anatek Laboratories
509.838.3999
[email protected]
Stephen Burchett,
Environmental Engineer
Principal
Budinger & Associates, Inc.
509.535.8841
[email protected]
Aimee Navickis-Brasch,
Senior Stormwater Engineer
HDR, Inc.
509.343.8515
[email protected]
Taylor Hoffman
Stormwater Engineer
HDR, Inc.
509.343.8477
[email protected]
Matt Carlson, Regional
Stormwater Coordinator
Asotin County, City of
Asotin, and the City of
Clarkston
509.243.2074
[email protected]
Bill Aukett, Stormwater
Program Manager
City of Moses Lake
509.764.3792
[email protected]
Adrianne Pearson,
Stormwater Permit
Coordinator
City of Spokane
509.625.7908
[email protected]
Chad Philips,
Stormwater Engineer
City of Spokane Valley
509.720.5013
[email protected]
Brad Daly,
Stormwater Coordinator
City of Walla Walla
509.524.4669
[email protected]
Jessica Shaw,
Utilities and Environmental
Manager
City of Wenatchee
509.888.7173
[email protected]
Danielle Mullins
Stormwater Lead
City of West Richland
509.967.5434
[email protected]
Ray Latham
Municipal Stormwater
Permit Manager
Department of Ecology
509.575.2807
[email protected]
Karen Dinicola,
Phase 2-3a Gross Grant
Ecology Project Manager
Department of Ecology
360.407.6550
[email protected]
Doug Howie,
Reviewer Structural and
Operational BMPs
Department of Ecology
360.407.644
[email protected]
Brandi Lubliner,
Reviewer Monitoring
System Designs
Department of Ecology
360.407.7140
[email protected]
Nigel Pickering
Professor
Washington State
University
509.335.8624
[email protected]
FINAL QAPP
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
8/1/2018
Page | iii
1.0
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL AND QAPP PUBLICATION INFORMATION …………………………………………………………………II
DOCUMENT HISTORY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… III
QAPP SIGNATURE PAGE …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. I
DISTRIBUTION LIST ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………II
1.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. III
2.0
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1
3.0
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ……………………………………………………………………………………. 2
3.1
INTRODUCTION TO THE OPERATIONAL BMP …………………………………………………………………………………… 2
3.2
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2
3.3
RESULTS OF PRIOR STUDIES ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5
3.4
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7
4.0
PROJECT OVERVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8
4.1
STUDY GOALS AND OUTCOMES ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8
4.2
STUDY DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 8
4.3
STUDY LOCATION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9
4.4
DATA NEEDED TO MEET OBJECTIVES ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 12
4.5
TASKS REQUIRED TO CONDUCT STUDY …………………………………………………………………………………………. 12
4.6
POTENTIAL CONSTRAINTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14
5.0
ORGANIZATION AND SCHEDULE………………………………………………………………………………………….. 15
5.1
KEY PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES …………………………………………………………. 15
5.2
PROJECT SCHEDULE …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 18
5.3
BUDGET AND FUNDING SOURCES …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 19
6.0
QUALITY OBJECTIVES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 21
7.0
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25
7.1
STUDY DESIGN OVERVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 25
7.2
TEST SITE(S) SELECTION PROCESS …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 26
7.3
OPERATIONAL BMP FUNCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 29
7.4
TYPE OF DATA BEING COLLECTED ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 30
7.5
SAMPLE COLLECTION PROCESS AND DESIGN(S) …………………………………………………………………………….. 33
8.0
SAMPLING PROCEDURES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 39
8.1
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES …………………………………………………………………………………………… 39
8.2
CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION METHODS, HOLDING TIMES …………………………………………………………….. 48
8.3
EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 49
8.4
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 49
8.5
CHAIN OF CUSTODY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 49
8.6
FIELD LOG REQUIREMENTS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 49
9.0
MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 50
9.1
PROCEDURES FOR COLLECTING FIELD MEASUREMENTS ………………………………………………………………….. 50
9.2
LABORATORY PROCEDURES …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 50
FINAL QAPP
STREET SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING COMPARISON
8/1/2018
Page | iv
9.3
SAMPLE PREPARATION METHODS ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 50
9.4
SPECIAL METHOD REQUIREMENTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 50
9.5
LAB(S) ACCREDITED FOR METHODS ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 51
10.0
QUALITY CONTROL ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 52
10.1
FIELD QC REQUIRED ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 52
10.2
LABORATORY QC REQUIRED ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 52
10.3
CORRECTIVE ACTION ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 52
11.0
DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN PROCEDURES ……………………………………………………………………… 53
11.1
DATA RECORDING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS …………………………………………………………………. 53
11.2
ELECTRONIC TRANSFER REQUIREMENTS …………………………………………………………………………………… 53
11.3
LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE REQUIREMENTS …………………………………………………………………………. 54
11.4
PROCEDURES FOR MISSING DATA …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 54
11.5
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR EXISTING DATA …………………………………………………………………………….. 54
11.6
DATA UPLOAD PROCEDURES …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 54
11.7
REVISIONS TO THE QAPP ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 54
12.0
AUDITS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 55
12.1
TECHNICAL SYSTEM AUDITS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 55
12.2
PROFICIENCY TESTING …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 55
13.0
DATA VERIFICATION AND USABILITY ASSESSMENT ……………………………………………………. 56
13.1
FIELD DATA VERIFICATION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 56
13.2
LABORATORY DATA VERIFICATION ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 56
13.3
DATA USABILITY ASSESSMENT …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 56
14.0
DATA ANALYSIS METHODS ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 57
14.1
DATA ANALYSIS METHODS…